Heath schematic site

[TChesek@Epix.Net]

Glen,

You did the noble thing by indicating what you feel is a valuable resource
for the rest of us. I too see value in it even if all of the links are not
active. As a matter of fact I downloaded a schematic not available elsewhere
for the IO-20 before this criticism appeared. Too bad there are people who
are only too happy to look for what they perceive as misteakes. I
intentionally misspelled a wurd or two for their benefit. This will allow
them more pleasure in finding my mistakes!

Tom K3TVC


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Zook" <gzook at YAHOO.COM>
To: <BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV>
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:48 PM
Subject: [BOATANCHORS-TEMPE] Heath schematic site


> This will be my last post on the subject:
>
> All that I did was to find what has now been
> identified as the archived information while
> reconstructing my bookmarks which had been "wiped out"
> by the installation of the "new" Netscape 8.1
> (replacing my Netscape 8.0).  I posted this
> information on several reflectors because over time a
> number of people had indicated that they "missed" the
> U.K. website.
>
> I got the link from a website the URL of which has
> been posted on several of the reflectors in the past
> few days.  Since the link worked (it still works, I
> checked it just a few minutes ago) and when I
> "clicked" on a couple of the links on the website they
> worked as well.  Therefore, I decided to let everyone
> know that the information was again available.
>
> I did not notice that the information was archived.
> Actually, I did not spend that much time on the
> website because I was in a hurry to reconstruct as
> much of my bookmarks as I could.  However, the link
> definitely is active.
>
> Now, I have been called all sorts of names including
> "idiot" because I posted the information which I
> believe that the majority of those who frequent the
> reflector did not have available.
>
> I just cannot believe that a number of people could
> get so upset because of what I consider to be useful
> information was posted.  Whether or not the site is
> "active" in the sense that additional information can
> be added is immaterial to the wealth of information
> that is present on the site (archived or not).
>
> Again, the URL of the site is
>
>
http://web.archive.org/web/20040208014604/www.circuitarchive.fsnet.co.uk/heath.htm
>
> That URL does work and the information on the site is
> excellent.
>
> Frankly, I do my best to help out on the reflectors
> and when several people get really hostile over
> whether or not a website is "active" or not even
> though the information is available that does tend to
> "tick me off"!
>
> Glen, K9STH
>
> Web sites
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~k9sth
> http://home.comcast.net/~zcomco
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subscription control -
http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
> To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
> Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html