[calix-nsp] IPv6 status

[Frank Bulk - iName.com]

We requested and were assigned a /32.  When building my IPv6 addressing plan
I discovered that when planning for the future, assigning a /48 to each
customer, regardless of size, would result in me burning up addresses too
quickly.  A /56 per customer provided a happy balance for us.

I've heard of other Calix shops doing VLAN per port -- can I ask people why
they're doing this?  Why not VLAN per service?

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Raul Rodriguez
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:20 PM
To: calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [calix-nsp] IPv6 status

Looking at the same, almost. /64 endpoints, /48's via DHCP-PD on vlan
per port (dual stack) subscribers.

-RR

On 8/6/10, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> Would love to hear what others are doing in regards to rolling out IPv6
over
> their Calix networks (FTTH and xDSL).
>
> We're doing VLAN per service for VDSL and FTTH and we'll likely turn up a
> /64 on that VLAN to hand out an IPv6 address in that /64 for their router
or
> singular PC, and then use DHCP-PD to hand out a /56 if their router
requests
> one.
>
> For DSL we'll likely do PPPoEv6.
>
> Frank
>
> _______________________________________________
> calix-nsp mailing list
> calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/calix-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
calix-nsp mailing list
calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/calix-nsp