[calix-nsp] IPv6 status
Frank Bulk - iName.com
frnkblk at iname.com
Fri Aug 6 23:33:04 EDT 2010
We requested and were assigned a /32. When building my IPv6 addressing plan
I discovered that when planning for the future, assigning a /48 to each
customer, regardless of size, would result in me burning up addresses too
quickly. A /56 per customer provided a happy balance for us.
I've heard of other Calix shops doing VLAN per port -- can I ask people why
they're doing this? Why not VLAN per service?
From: calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:calix-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Raul Rodriguez
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:20 PM
To: calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [calix-nsp] IPv6 status
Looking at the same, almost. /64 endpoints, /48's via DHCP-PD on vlan
per port (dual stack) subscribers.
On 8/6/10, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> Would love to hear what others are doing in regards to rolling out IPv6
> their Calix networks (FTTH and xDSL).
> We're doing VLAN per service for VDSL and FTTH and we'll likely turn up a
> /64 on that VLAN to hand out an IPv6 address in that /64 for their router
> singular PC, and then use DHCP-PD to hand out a /56 if their router
> For DSL we'll likely do PPPoEv6.
> calix-nsp mailing list
> calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
calix-nsp mailing list
calix-nsp at puck.nether.net
More information about the calix-nsp