[calix-nsp] IPv6 status

[Dan White]

On 06/08/10 22:33 -0500, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
>We requested and were assigned a /32.  When building my IPv6 addressing plan
>I discovered that when planning for the future, assigning a /48 to each
>customer, regardless of size, would result in me burning up addresses too
>quickly.  A /56 per customer provided a happy balance for us.
>
>I've heard of other Calix shops doing VLAN per port -- can I ask people why
>they're doing this?  Why not VLAN per service?

Layer two separation, with all layer 3 enforcement done on a centralized
router. Access gear can be very simple in such as approach, with little or
no layer 3 knowledge.

We're also debating whether to use /48 or /56.

-- 
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Ph  918.366.0248 (direct)   main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610            email: dwhite at olp.net
http://www.btcbroadband.com