[cisco-bba] SSG / Radius Counters

Ritesh Bansal ribansal at cisco.com
Thu Dec 18 05:56:57 EST 2003


Hi Ash:
 >
 > I
 > have check a few times and we are not wrapping around the 32bit counters...
 >
[RIT] SSG [in version 12.3(5.6)T] supports 64-bit counters.. and uses the 
gigaword-attributes that radius RFC-2869 dictates to communicate with aaa-server.

more responses in the other mail-thread.

cheers,
ritesh


 >
 > Ash Garg wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> The counters seem to very different and vary per user... (I think, still
> testing this theory).
> 
> Basically on the SSG there are three services (open garden, Free, General).
> The General is the default route. So per user we get three accounting
> records:
> 
> A) the user
> B) the user and Free service (with QOS)
> C) The user and General Service (without QOS)
> 
> 1) The ppp keepalive are okay with me...I guessed this. However should the
> type "A" accounting records should see these?
> 
> 2) All the data is being sent/received from the General service. So there is
> movement in the counters in the Type A and Type C records. The Type B record
> counters always show zero as they are supposed to.
> 
> 3) Nothing is being directed to the open garden as this is tied down to a
> /32 website.
> 
> I check the debugs "debug ssg data" and there is no QOSing of the traffic
> to/from the user through the General Service.
> 
> The difference is quite large, ie "Real" downloaded traffic is 400Meg but
> the Radius counters in the Type C records and Type A records are very small,
> around 8Meg. The session times (start/stop) are quite accurate though. I
> have check a few times and we are not wrapping around the 32bit counters...
> 
> Thanks,
> Ash
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ritesh Bansal [mailto:ribansal at cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 18 December 2003 10:18 AM
> To: Ash Garg
> Cc: cisco-bba at puck.nether.net; rsaldanh at cisco.com; Pankaj Vyas
> Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] SSG / Radius Counters
> 
> 
> Hi Ash:
> there can be multiple reasons for the counters on vaccess to be different
> than
> SSG counters:
> 
> 1- the PPP keepalives are not accounted by SSG for the host accounting
> 
> 2- if the packets are going to Open-Garden service or default-network, SSG
> does not account that traffic
> 
> 3- if the packets are dropped by SSG because of policing for example, the
> input counters on the vaccess will be more than counters on SSG hosts
> 
> 
> Can u tell me what traffic are you sending and to what destinations? does
> any
> one of the above reasons justify the difference in the counters?
> 
> 
> cheers,
> ritesh
> 
> 
>  >
>  > Ash Garg wrote:
> 
>>Has anyone had problems with the Radius counters not being accurate on the
>>SSG? The virtual interface counters are reasonably accurate but the
> 
> counters
> 
>>in the "show ssg connection x x" and Radius accounting records are not. We
>>are using two version of IOS 12.3(5.7) Mainline and 12.3(5.6)T both of
> 
> which
> 
>>are showing instances of broken counters.
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ash
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the cisco-bba mailing list