[cisco-bba] L2TP (PPPoA/E) aggregator

[Andy Schutz (aschutz)]

I'm not sure if anyone answered this but I would suggest a move to
NPE-G1 as the most economical and logical progression.  If you want to
take an even bigger step-up, I would suggest looking at the Cisco 10000.
Also, make sure you have the max memory.

Cheers,

Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-bba-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-bba-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 4:55 AM
> To: cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-bba] L2TP (PPPoA/E) aggregator
> 
> 
> We are using a 7206VXR (NPE300 - 12.3.1a) for terminating 
> L2TP sessions.
> These sessions are coming through L2TP from 2 ATM interfaces, 
> so there are no 
> fragmentation issues.
> 
> We also use CAR on every virtual interface but we can't use 
> CEF, since there is bug 
> (CSCea34500) which annoys us.
> 
> The cpu load is around 40%, when we have 350 sessions.
> 
> What would be the next logical solution?
> 
> 1) NPE400
> 2) NPE-G1
> 3) 6400
> 
> If i use more than one NRP on the 6400 will i be able to 
> support more L2TP sessions?
> For example 1 NRP = x sessions => 2 NRP = 2x sessions and so on....
> 
> -- 
> ***********************************
>     Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
> Network Design & Operations Center
>            FORTHnet S.A.
>        <achatz at forthnet.gr>
> ***********************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>