[cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboehmer at cisco.com
Wed Jul 6 12:26:55 EDT 2005


So you terminate L2TP sessions? Then it's the LAC's connect-speed which
is sent during ICRQ as L2TP AVP. You have no control over it on the
LNS..

	oli 

Mark Tohill <> wrote on Wednesday, July 06, 2005 6:13 PM:

> Apologies,
> 
> Replied to digest and removed subject....
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Tohill
> Sent: 06 July 2005 17:11
> To: 'cisco-bba at puck.nether.net'
> Subject: RE:[cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
> 
> Sorry, Oliver
> 
> I removed that Loopback IP! (paranoia in family for years)
> 
> .
> .
> .
> 
> no vpdn history failure cause normal
> vpdn history failure table-size 50
> vpdn session-limit 16000
> vpdn ip udp ignore checksum
> !
> vpdn-group 1
>  description VPDN-GROUP-1
>  accept-dialin
>   protocol l2tp
>   virtual-template 1
>  terminate-from hostname <removed>
>  source-ip <removed>
>  lcp renegotiation on-mismatch
>  l2tp tunnel password <removed>
> !
> virtual-template 1 pre-clone 8000
> !
> 
> interface ATM1/0.101 point-to-point
>  description Fibre 1
>  bandwidth 74880
>  ip address <removed>
>  pvc 101/35
>   vbr-nrt 74880 74880 290
>   oam-pvc manage
>   oam retry 2 2 2
>   encapsulation aal5snap
>  !
> !
> interface ATM1/0.201 point-to-point
>  description Fibre 2
>  bandwidth 74880
>  ip address <removed>
>  pvc 201/35
>   vbr-nrt 74880 74880 290
>   oam-pvc manage
>   oam retry 2 2 2
>   encapsulation aal5snap
> 
> 
> interface Virtual-Template1
>  description Virtual-Template
>  ip unnumbered Loopback0
>  ip tcp adjust-mss 1420
>  ip mroute-cache
>  no logging event link-status
>  load-interval 30
>  no snmp trap link-status
>  ntp disable
>  peer default ip address pool dp01 dp02 dp03 dp04 dp05 dp06 dp07 dp08
> dp09
> dp10 dp11 dp12 dp13 dp14 dp15 dp16 dp17 dp18 dp19
>  keepalive 100
>  ppp authentication chap
> 
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-bba-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-bba-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> cisco-bba-request at puck.nether.net
> Sent: 06 July 2005 17:00
> To: cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> Subject: cisco-bba Digest, Vol 26, Issue 2
> 
> Send cisco-bba mailing list submissions to
> 	cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cisco-bba-request at puck.nether.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cisco-bba-owner at puck.nether.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-bba digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces (Mark Tohill)
>    2. RE: Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
>       (Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer))
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:47:59 +0100
> From: "Mark Tohill" <Mark at u.tv>
> Subject: [cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
> To: <cisco-bba at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	<658F94741F4A8A4F94171E37E417488B0A316B at UTVEXCHANGE.utv.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone any idea where Bandwidth figures are got from?
> 
> 
> 
> Are they picked up at an ATM level? i.e Why do the two examples below
> differ?
> 
> 
> 
> Any help appreciated.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> sh int Vi8098
> 
> Virtual-Access8098 is up, line protocol is up
> 
>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
> 
>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
> 
>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 155520 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec
> 
> 
> 
> sh int Vi8518
> 
> Virtual-Access8518 is up, line protocol is up
> 
>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
> 
>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
> 
>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 565 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec,
> 
>      reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-bba/attachments/20050706/a6a07d1
> 3/attachment-0001.html
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:55:22 +0200
> From: "Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\)" <oboehmer at cisco.com>
> Subject: RE: [cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
> To: "Mark Tohill" <Mark at u.tv>, <cisco-bba at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> 
> <70B7A1CCBFA5C649BD562B6D9F7ED784DD71E4 at xmb-ams-333.emea.cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Mark,
> 
> VAI bandwidth is usually picked up from a lower layer (ATM, ISDN,
> L2TP), really depends what this Interface is bound to (ATM vc, PPPoE,
> L2TP/PPPoVPDN, ISDN, etc.))..
> 
> 	oli
> 
> P.S: "Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)",
> the "removed" doesn't sound right..
> 
> Mark Tohill <> wrote on Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:48 PM:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Has anyone any idea where Bandwidth figures are got from?
>> 
>> Are they picked up at an ATM level? i.e Why do the two examples
>> below differ? 
>> 
>> Any help appreciated.
>> 
>> sh int Vi8098
>> 
>> Virtual-Access8098 is up, line protocol is up
>> 
>>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
>> 
>>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
>> 
>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 155520 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> sh int Vi8518
>> 
>> Virtual-Access8518 is up, line protocol is up
>> 
>>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
>> 
>>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
>> 
>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 565 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec,
>> 
>>      reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
> 
> 
> End of cisco-bba Digest, Vol 26, Issue 2
> ****************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba



More information about the cisco-bba mailing list