[cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces

[Nigel Camp]

You can always set the bandwidth from radius for the virtual-access.

Cheers,
Nigel

On 07/07/2005, at 2:26 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:

> So you terminate L2TP sessions? Then it's the LAC's connect-speed  
> which
> is sent during ICRQ as L2TP AVP. You have no control over it on the
> LNS..
>
>     oli
>
> Mark Tohill <> wrote on Wednesday, July 06, 2005 6:13 PM:
>
>
>> Apologies,
>>
>> Replied to digest and removed subject....
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Tohill
>> Sent: 06 July 2005 17:11
>> To: 'cisco-bba at puck.nether.net'
>> Subject: RE:[cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
>>
>> Sorry, Oliver
>>
>> I removed that Loopback IP! (paranoia in family for years)
>>
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>
>> no vpdn history failure cause normal
>> vpdn history failure table-size 50
>> vpdn session-limit 16000
>> vpdn ip udp ignore checksum
>> !
>> vpdn-group 1
>>  description VPDN-GROUP-1
>>  accept-dialin
>>   protocol l2tp
>>   virtual-template 1
>>  terminate-from hostname <removed>
>>  source-ip <removed>
>>  lcp renegotiation on-mismatch
>>  l2tp tunnel password <removed>
>> !
>> virtual-template 1 pre-clone 8000
>> !
>>
>> interface ATM1/0.101 point-to-point
>>  description Fibre 1
>>  bandwidth 74880
>>  ip address <removed>
>>  pvc 101/35
>>   vbr-nrt 74880 74880 290
>>   oam-pvc manage
>>   oam retry 2 2 2
>>   encapsulation aal5snap
>>  !
>> !
>> interface ATM1/0.201 point-to-point
>>  description Fibre 2
>>  bandwidth 74880
>>  ip address <removed>
>>  pvc 201/35
>>   vbr-nrt 74880 74880 290
>>   oam-pvc manage
>>   oam retry 2 2 2
>>   encapsulation aal5snap
>>
>>
>> interface Virtual-Template1
>>  description Virtual-Template
>>  ip unnumbered Loopback0
>>  ip tcp adjust-mss 1420
>>  ip mroute-cache
>>  no logging event link-status
>>  load-interval 30
>>  no snmp trap link-status
>>  ntp disable
>>  peer default ip address pool dp01 dp02 dp03 dp04 dp05 dp06 dp07 dp08
>> dp09
>> dp10 dp11 dp12 dp13 dp14 dp15 dp16 dp17 dp18 dp19
>>  keepalive 100
>>  ppp authentication chap
>>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-bba-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-bba-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
>> cisco-bba-request at puck.nether.net
>> Sent: 06 July 2005 17:00
>> To: cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: cisco-bba Digest, Vol 26, Issue 2
>>
>> Send cisco-bba mailing list submissions to
>>     cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>     cisco-bba-request at puck.nether.net
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>     cisco-bba-owner at puck.nether.net
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of cisco-bba digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces (Mark Tohill)
>>    2. RE: Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
>>       (Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer))
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> -
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:47:59 +0100
>> From: "Mark Tohill" <Mark at u.tv>
>> Subject: [cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
>> To: <cisco-bba at puck.nether.net>
>> Message-ID:
>>     <658F94741F4A8A4F94171E37E417488B0A316B at UTVEXCHANGE.utv.local>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone any idea where Bandwidth figures are got from?
>>
>>
>>
>> Are they picked up at an ATM level? i.e Why do the two examples below
>> differ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Any help appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> sh int Vi8098
>>
>> Virtual-Access8098 is up, line protocol is up
>>
>>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
>>
>>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
>>
>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 155520 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec
>>
>>
>>
>> sh int Vi8518
>>
>> Virtual-Access8518 is up, line protocol is up
>>
>>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
>>
>>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
>>
>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 565 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec,
>>
>>      reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>>
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-bba/attachments/20050706/ 
> a6a07d1
>
>> 3/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:55:22 +0200
>> From: "Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\)" <oboehmer at cisco.com>
>> Subject: RE: [cisco-bba] Bandwidth on Virtual-Access interfaces
>> To: "Mark Tohill" <Mark at u.tv>, <cisco-bba at puck.nether.net>
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> <70B7A1CCBFA5C649BD562B6D9F7ED784DD71E4 at xmb-ams-333.emea.cisco.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> VAI bandwidth is usually picked up from a lower layer (ATM, ISDN,
>> L2TP), really depends what this Interface is bound to (ATM vc, PPPoE,
>> L2TP/PPPoVPDN, ISDN, etc.))..
>>
>>     oli
>>
>> P.S: "Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)",
>> the "removed" doesn't sound right..
>>
>> Mark Tohill <> wrote on Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:48 PM:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Has anyone any idea where Bandwidth figures are got from?
>>>
>>> Are they picked up at an ATM level? i.e Why do the two examples
>>> below differ?
>>>
>>> Any help appreciated.
>>>
>>> sh int Vi8098
>>>
>>> Virtual-Access8098 is up, line protocol is up
>>>
>>>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
>>>
>>>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
>>>
>>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 155520 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> sh int Vi8518
>>>
>>> Virtual-Access8518 is up, line protocol is up
>>>
>>>   Hardware is Virtual Access interface
>>>
>>>   Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (removed)
>>>
>>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 565 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec,
>>>
>>>      reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-bba mailing list
>> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>>
>>
>> End of cisco-bba Digest, Vol 26, Issue 2
>> ****************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-bba mailing list
>> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>