[cisco-bba] windows messenger disconnects in periodic moments , in pppoe connection

[Ilir Nako]

Look what is the output of one virtual-access parametres:

7200pppoe#sh interfaces virtual-access 2.36
Virtual-Access2.36 is up, line protocol is up 
  Hardware is Virtual Access interface
  Interface is unnumbered. Using address of GigabitEthernet0/2.161 (192.168.160.1)
  MTU 1492 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec, 
     reliability 255/255, txload 29/255, rxload 25/255
  Encapsulation PPP, LCP Open
  Open: IPCP
  PPPoE vaccess, cloned from Virtual-Template161
  Vaccess status 0x0
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
     63 packets input, 2060 bytes
     44 packets output, 559 bytes
  Time to interface disconnect: absolute 04:56:48, idle 03:16:48
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never

7200pppoe#sh interfaces virtual-access 2.36
Virtual-Access2.36 is up, line protocol is up 
  Hardware is Virtual Access interface
  Interface is unnumbered. Using address of GigabitEthernet0/2.161 (192.168.160.1)
  MTU 1492 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec, 
     reliability 255/255, txload 29/255, rxload 25/255
  Encapsulation PPP, LCP Open
  Open: IPCP
  PPPoE vaccess, cloned from Virtual-Template161
  Vaccess status 0x0
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
     63 packets input, 2060 bytes
     44 packets output, 559 bytes
  Time to interface disconnect: absolute 04:56:47, idle 03:16:47


Here I think must be the problem .

This absolute timer is directed by radius server . 

ilir





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Blayzor" <rblayzor.bulk at inoc.net>
To: "Ilir Nako" <inako at abcom.al>
Cc: <cisco-bba at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] windows messenger disconnects in periodic moments , in pppoe connection


> On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Ilir Nako wrote:
>> interface Virtual-Template161
>>  mtu 1492
>>  ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/2.161
>>  ip nat inside
>>  ip virtual-reassembly
>>  peer default ip address pool pppoevlan161
>>  ppp mtu adaptive
>>  ppp authentication pap
>>  ppp multilink
> 
> 
> Lose "ip virtual-reassembly".  That's something you want to limit on  
> to CPE devices or symmetric connections, not on a bunch of individual  
> PPP terminations.  Not to mention, if you're doing this for a few  
> hundred PPPoX sessions, it's probably a considerable performance hit.
> 
> Also, are you doing multilink?  If not, you can lose that as well..
> 
> -- 
> Robert Blayzor, BOFH
> INOC, LLC
> rblayzor at inoc.net
> http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 2888 (20080220) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-bba/attachments/20080726/55aa11da/attachment.html>