[cisco-nas] isdn map command and pots dial-peer

Eric Knudson ericknudson at gmail.com
Sun Dec 19 21:10:10 EST 2004


Have you tried adding a higher preference to dial-peer 11? adding in
cisco-voip - perhaps someone there can comment.


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:10:00 -0800 (PST), Erick B. <erickbe at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Here is a snippet from the 7200 config.
> 
> interface Serial3/0:23
>  no ip address
>  no logging event link-status
>  isdn switch-type primary-ni
>  isdn incoming-voice voice
>  isdn map address 18006592646 plan isdn type national
>  no cdp enable
> 
> voice-port 3/0:23
>  input gain -3
>  output attenuation 3
>  no vad
>  no comfort-noise
>  music-threshold -70
>  bearer-cap Speech
> 
> dial-peer voice 11 pots
>  destination-pattern 1[2-9]..[2-9]......
>  progress_ind setup enable 3
>  progress_ind alert enable 8
>  progress_ind progress enable 8
>  progress_ind connect enable 8
>  direct-inward-dial
>  port 3/0:23
>  forward-digits all
>  prefix 1010432
> 
> dial-peer voice 2 pots
>  destination-pattern 1800.......
>  port 3/0:23
>  forward-digits all
> 
> The pots dial-peer 2 had pretty much all the same
> other settings as the 11 dial peer, but same issue and
> we stripped it down and have same issue when the isdn
> map is under D channel.
> 
> All other 800 #s go out the 2 dial peer fine except
> the number we have isdn map for. When isdn map is
> removed it goes out the 11 dial peer and prefixes 1010
> number and call fails.
> 
> --- Eric Knudson <ericknudson at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Erick,
> >
> > I'm under the impression that dial-peer selection
> > and modifying
> > plan/type (via isdn map command) take place in
> > wildly different
> > sections of IOS, and would be really surprised if
> > that's actually
> > causing the problem. Could we get some debug voip
> > ccapi output for the
> > two situations, maybe even the result from a 'show
> > dialplan number
> > XXXXX' with/without the isdn map command in place?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:59:05 -0800 (PST), Erick B.
> > <erickbe at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have been trying to find out if there is an
> > > interaction or effect isdn map command under D
> > channel
> > > has on dial-peer operations.
> > >
> > > We have a situation where we need to change the
> > > numbering plan/type on a 800 # and we have a pots
> > > dial-peer with a 1800........ destination pattern
> > and
> > > it works for all 800 #s except the 800 # in the
> > isdn
> > > map statement.
> > >
> > > When we call the 800 # that matches the isdn map,
> > the
> > > 800  dial peer is not used and it goes to the
> > other LD
> > > dial peer which puts a 1010 prefix code on calls
> > and
> > > the call fails.
> > >
> > > >From looking at debugs, it appears to try to use
> > the
> > > 800 dial peer but skips on to the other LD dial
> > peer
> > > w/1010 prefix.
> > >
> > > Any idea on why isdn map command effects dial-peer
> > > operation?  We have a TAC case on this for a few
> > > weeks.
> > > This is 7206 with 12.3(8)T5. The same problem
> > happened
> > > on earlier IOS. We upgraded a few weeks ago to see
> > if
> > > it would help or not.
> > >
> > > Were using a translation rule now but I would like
> > to
> > > figure out whats up the isdn map command and dial
> > > peer.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance, Erick
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > All your favorites on one personal page â€" Try My
> > Yahoo!
> > > http://my.yahoo.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nas mailing list
> > > cisco-nas at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas
> > >
> >
> 
>                 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>



More information about the cisco-nas mailing list