[cisco-nas] Access point proximity

[Aaron Leonard]

> Hi,
>   I recall someone mentioning an issue when co-locating APs too close together
> even when they're broadcasting on difference channels (1,6 or 11).  We use
> Cisco gear but I suspect this is a 'radio' issue and therefore vendor-neutral?
> If this is the case, is there a rule-of-thumb minimum distance for 802.11b?
> Any chance this distance would increase when upgrading to G?

> .......thanks in advance........Jamie

There should be zero problems with 802.11B/G transmissions
on channels 1, 6, and 11 geographically overlapping.  The
energy transmitted in those channels should be completely
discrete.  Where did you hear this?

(Should we make a new discussion list for Cisco WLAN products?
If so, what should we call it?  cisco-wlan?  cisco-wifi?
cisco-802.11?)

Cheers,

Aaron