[cisco-nas] Access point proximity (fwd)....please ignore!!

James Savage jsavage at yorku.ca
Thu Jan 15 14:13:29 EST 2004


My apologies folks........I sent this to the wrong group.

James Savage                              York University
Senior Com. Tech.                         108 Steacie Bldg.
jsavage at yorku.ca                          4700 Keele Street
phone: 416-736-2100 ext.22605             Toronto, Ontario
fax: 416-736-5701                         M3J 1P3, CANADA
                /\      /\      /\      /\
               /  \    /  \    /  \    /  \
                   \  /    \  /    \  /
                    \/      \/      \/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:41:43 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: James Savage <jsavage at yorku.ca>
To: cisco-nas at puck.nether.net
Organization: York University
Subject: Access point proximity

Hi,
  I recall someone mentioning an issue when co-locating APs too close together
even when they're broadcasting on difference channels (1,6 or 11).  We use
Cisco gear but I suspect this is a 'radio' issue and therefore vendor-neutral?
If this is the case, is there a rule-of-thumb minimum distance for 802.11b?
Any chance this distance would increase when upgrading to G?

.......thanks in advance........Jamie


James Savage                              York University
Senior Com. Tech.                         108 Steacie Bldg.
jsavage at yorku.ca                          4700 Keele Street
phone: 416-736-2100 ext.22605             Toronto, Ontario
fax: 416-736-5701                         M3J 1P3, CANADA
                /\      /\      /\      /\
               /  \    /  \    /  \    /  \
                   \  /    \  /    \  /
                    \/      \/      \/




More information about the cisco-nas mailing list