[nsp] Methods for Non-BGP multihoming

Andi Bernard abernard@inflow.com
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:54:11 -0600


Actually, RFC 1930 has a more direct reference regarding inconsistent AS

http://asg.web.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc1930.html#sec-7


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan O'Connell [mailto:ryan@complicity.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:35 AM
> To: Daniel Golding; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; joe.provo@rcn.com
> Subject: Re: [nsp] Methods for Non-BGP multihoming
> 
> 
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:05:49 -0400 Daniel Golding 
> <dgolding@sockeye.com> wrote:
> > RFC 1771 does indeed specify that inconsistant origin AS is an error
> > state.
> 
> I just reread the RFC and I can't see that anywhere.
> 
> In fact, origin AS information is lost when AS_SEQUENCEs are 
> converted to
> AS_SETs from what I can tell so it would be difficult to 
> enforce this anyway.

>