[nsp] V.35 or G.703?+Undocumented commands

[Nic McCartney]

hey, he asked WHY you have so many un-doc'd commands, not if this was in the
CCO or not ;-)

Nic

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Philip Smith
Sent: 11 December 2002 09:58
To: Birsen Ozturk
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] V.35 or G.703?+Undocumented commands


At 10:22 11/12/2002 +0200, =?us-ascii?Q?Birsen_Ozturk?= wrote:
>Hello
>Is there a way to understand whether the serial interfaces of 75xx
>series are of G.703 or V.35 type? (via show or some other commands)
>Thanks in advance

show controller ... should tell you what you want.

>Another thing I want to say, why Cisco keeps so many undocumented
>commands? What is the thing behind that? These are just the two of the
>commands I found out that are undocumented in past two days:
>bgp bestpath as-path ignore (under the router config ignores the as-path
>length while choosing the best path)

This is in the IOS configuration manual - simple search on the public CCO
points up several URLs:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configuratio
n_guide_chapter09186a00800d97fc.html#xtocid16

>ospf auto-cost reference-bandwith (again under the router-config changes
>the default ospf path cost which is 100Mb)

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a0
080094704.shtml#QA

enjoy!

philip
--
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Nic A McCartney.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 379 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20021211/c7306157/NicAMcCartney.vcf