[nsp] Is default failover in dual-homed DSL possible?
dtodd at partners.org
dtodd at partners.org
Tue Dec 17 16:04:17 EST 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
What type of router are you using? is the DSL cisco device or do you
manage that device?
==DMT>
- ----SIGNAURE-------
Douglas M. Todd, Jr.
Network Engineering
Partners Health Care
Building 149
149 13 Street
Charlestown, MA 02129-200
Tel: 617.726.1403
Email: dtodd@partners.org
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP Finger Print: 9429 CAE3 B2D1 C2E1 DFBC E7A6 E90A 9BE5 C7B6 47BC
Key available via email.
Verisign S/N: 3ff65cdf58b9dceda004baeed49e16cf
https://digitalid.verisign.com/services/client/index.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Mark
> Boolootian Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:24 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] Is default failover in dual-homed DSL possible?
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I'm looking for a solution for home/business DSL users who
> want dual-homed
> DSL connections to protect against outages. The basic
> picture looks like
> this:
>
>
> ---------- -----------
> | ISP 1 | | ISP 2 |
> ---------- -----------
> | |
> | |
> | |
> ----- -----
> | | | | <- DSL modems
> ----- -----
> \ /
> ----------------
> | router |
> ----------------
> |
> |
> --------------------
>
> The router is doing NAT, and there is no dynamic routing
> protocol running
> between the router and the ISPs (i.e. typical home DSL
> setup). The question
> is, are there any products/mechanisms for allowing a static
> default pointing
> at one ISP to failover to the other ISP in the event of a
> network outage
> at the first ISP?
>
> In the above diagram, a failure with DSL would take down the
> PPP connection,
> so presumably if the DSL modem were built-in to the router,
> the router would
> notice that the PPP connection was down, and perhaps the
> right thing could be
> made to happen. Unfortunately, I don't know of a small
> router that would
> accommodate this solution. I suppose if one were to
> terminate each DSL
> connection in an individual router, and then feed both those
> connections into
> a third router, one might be able to manufacture something
> that would work,
> but I don't think I'd want to put that on my resume (much
> less mention it on
> this list).
>
> In order to accomodate failures beyond a dead DSL link, I've
> got a rather
> messy idea in my head of a box sitting on the LAN pinging
> nameservers in each
> of the ISP's networks, and making routing changes on the
> router accordingly.
>
> Has anyone on this list set up anything to deal with such a
> situation?
>
> Thanks very much,
> mb
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
iQA/AwUBPf+RUQgiZycqTvq3EQJbewCcCTPBGa7fJztdWzr7K7vlFdjWZQwAn0xd
AeZMIqpROlr4JWiA/mGI6VeN
=WNKf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list