[nsp] BGP requirements

[Jared Mauch]

	In that case, why do they need full routes?

	just take default from each provider or some set of
their providers routes.

	- jared

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 08:38:40PM -0800, Z wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 04:27:44PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > 
> > 	You really need 256M.  I've seen people squeeze it into 128M
> > but it is quite tight.
> > 
> 
> 
>    Thanks for the reply Jared.   I was fearing that this was the
> case.   Any recommendation on hardware here, as 7206's tend to run
> on the expensive side and 3660's tend to be fairly overkill as well.
> Anything more slim that can have 256MB of memory in it, Cisco-wise?
> 
>    Essentially this guy will probably house just T1 circuit with a
> currently unknown provider to do BGP for failover purposes should
> our colocation fail miserably.   Maybe there is a better standard
> alternative to this since we just have a /24.  If so, I'd love to
> hear alternatives or providers that will even do BGP with a /24 to
> some extent.
> 
>    Thanks in advance again... still trying to get used to Cisco's
> new site.. ;( 
> 
> 
> .z

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.