[nsp] Redundant Default gateway

[Richard Walsh]

Hi guys, I just realized I posted my question to the wrong list. I don't
want to waste anyone's time, but I do appreciate the help :)

Rich


Marcus Keane wrote:
> 
> Richard, the next hop for the primary default may have been resolvable
> by another less specific route. Try referencing an interface as well as
> a next hop. e.g.
> 
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0 192.168.10.1
> HTH,
> Marcus.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Walsh [mailto:rmw1@net1plus.com]
> Sent: 13 November 2002 15:10
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] Redundant Default gateway
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Long time lurker, first time poster. I have a 2600 router w/a T1 for
> internet access. It also has a coonection to a private frame-relay
> network. My goal is to have all traffic diverted thru the private frame,
> to a remote ite, and out it's internet link, when the Primary T! goes
> down. I tried adding another default route with a higher administrative
> distance. The two routes look like this: 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 0.0.0.0
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.17 10 I brought down the primary T1 but the original
> route stayed in the routing table. Am I going about this the right way?
> Any help would be highly appreciated!! Thanks
> 
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/