[nsp] RIB failure when using backdoor network

[Jared Mauch]

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:16:40PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > > Which is something I don't understand either.  We're running our backbone
> > > on 7200/7500, and would really like to roll out IPv6 - but definitely no
> > > way to go to 12.2T yet.
> > 
> > 	yeah.. because !(12.2 > 12.0)
> 
> I don't fully understand what you're trying to tell me - but I was just
> judging from other ISP's experiences.  12.2T on backbone routers (doing
> IPv4 BGP, IPv6 BGP, IPv4 OSPF and IPv4 PIM/MBGP) is Really Bad.
> 
> 12.2(11)T1 seems to be the first image that doesn't do Very Bad Things
> immediately, but I still don't trust that train.

	I was meaning to convey the fact that 12.2 is in no way equal to
or better than 12.0 at all.

	There is no feature-path consistency that other vendors provide.

	eg: juniper has 5.0  5.1 has everything 5.0 has and some new
stuff.

	Cisco has

	12.0
	12.1
	12.2

	12.2 is 'newer' in a way, but in no way contains everything
contained in previous versions.

	- jared

> 
> gert
> 
> -- 
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                            //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.