[nsp] dot1q causes port error?
Stephen J. Wilcox
steve@telecomplete.co.uk
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:41:56 +0000 (GMT)
MPLS isnt enabled on this .. I have seen similar tho where MPLS is enabled
however on the switches where I saw it the giant counter increased only, not
crc's etc
Steve
--
Stephen J. Wilcox
BSc (Hons). CCIE #10730
Technical Director, Telecomplete
http://www.telecomplete.co.uk/
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Tomas Daniska wrote:
>
> is it possible that you send larger frames to the interface (such as
> those with mpls tags)?
>
> i'm sure on this for 3524XL and believe that it also applies for 2924 -
> it's a problem that came due to stretching mtu. originally, the ethernet
> controllers used did not support baby giants. since some release (i
> don't remember exatly which one) the cisco folk managed to tweak the
> controller microcode so they are supported now but they were unable to
> change the hardware routines for crc computation so the switches started
> forwarding baby giants but for the cost of generating false crc errors
>
> --
>
> deejay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Temkin, David [mailto:temkin@sig.com]
> > Sent: 25. novembra 2002 20:17
> > To: 'Stephen J. Wilcox'
> > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [nsp] dot1q causes port error?
> >
> >
> > I'm positive it's actually a problem with dot1q on the 2924's. 110%
> > positive, because I had the same exact issue two weeks ago
> > between a URM
> > (3660 on a card) and a 2924 in a remote office.
> >
> > AFAIK, disabling keepalives doesn't actually make the problem
> > go away - it
> > didn't for me. The only fix that worked for me was
> > converting the trunk to
> > ISL. It seems pretty obvious from the fact that the counters
> > are exactly
> > the same.
> >
> > I should have looked at the bug before I sent it to you,
> > because it's not
> > the same as what's happening here.
> >
> > First of all, the 35xx series doesn't have the same
> > limitation as the 2924.
> > Give it a shot if you can... I'm not sure what kind of production
> > environment you run.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stephen J. Wilcox [mailto:steve@telecomplete.co.uk]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:13 PM
> > > To: Temkin, David
> > > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: RE: [nsp] dot1q causes port error?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi David,
> > > this is actually saying it is a problem in ISL and NOT in
> > > dot1q, I have seen a similar reference and have disabled
> > > keepalives. THis makes no difference tho, the errors are
> > > there as before.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Temkin, David wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's a known issue caused by keepalives.
> > > >
> > > > See bug CSCdr22809
> > > >
> > > > It's a hardware limitation on the switch. The router sends
> > > keepalives
> > > > untagged and the switch can't deal with it.
> > > >
> > > > Convert the trunk to ISL and they will go away. I promise. :-)
> > > >
> > > > -Dave
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Stephen J. Wilcox [mailto:steve@telecomplete.co.uk]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:00 PM
> > > > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > > > > Subject: [nsp] dot1q causes port error?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've a Cat2924-XL-EN (c2900XL-c3h2s-mz-120.5.2-XU.bin)
> > > > > connecting to a 7200 with IO-FE (c7200-js-mz.122-8.T5)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm running dot1q on them and seeing errors. I'm sure theres
> > > > > no cable fault and have replicated this with different
> > > > > hardware. I'm unable to find anything in the bug toolkit
> > > > > (which doesnt appear to support IOS for switches very well)
> > > > > and google showed nothing useful either.
> > > > >
> > > > > ANyone else seen this and perhaps knows the problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > relevant counters (no others show error)
> > > > >
> > > > > Switch:
> > > > > Received 89 broadcasts, 1698991 runts, 0 giants, 0
> > throttles
> > > > > 1819995 input errors, 121004 CRC, 0 frame, 44 overrun,
> > > > > 132 ignored
> > > > >
> > > > > Router:
> > > > > 16687740 packets output, 3005655898 bytes, 299991 underruns
> > > > > 299991 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
> > > > >
> > > > > Note the errors occur in the direction router to switch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, pinging the switch or devices beyond the switch doesnt
> > > > > appear to produce any packet loss that ought to be associated
> > > > > to errored frames
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-> nsp
> > > > > archive at
> > > > > http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its
> > > > attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended
> > recipient,
> > > > please notify the sender immediately by reply and
> > > immediately delete
> > > > this message and all its attachments. Any review, use,
> > > reproduction,
> > > > disclosure or dissemination of this message or any
> > attachment by an
> > > > unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this
> > > message nor
> > > > any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer,
> > > > solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any
> > security or other
> > > > financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her
> > > employer nor any
> > > > of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the
> > > > completeness or accuracy of any of the information
> > > contained herein or
> > > > that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its
> > attachments is
> > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> > sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this
> > message and all its
> > attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or
> > dissemination of
> > this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
> > prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or
> > should be construed as an offer, solicitation or
> > recommendation to buy or
> > sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the
> > sender, his or
> > her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any
> > warranties as
> > to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information
> > contained herein
> > or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>