[nsp] RE: Route maps versus access-lists in NAT
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Apr 25 00:20:24 EDT 2003
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:57:07PM -0500, Pete Templin wrote:
> Ah, a question that I can answer. NAT can use standard access lists or route maps, but can't directly use extended access lists. So if you want to use extended access lists to classify whether traffic should be NATted, you'll need to embed the ACL in a route map.
That might be true for *named* access lists, but "normal" extended access
lists (numbered 100-199) can be used fine. We do that all the time.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering at physik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list