[nsp] CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC question

[Buhrmaster, Gary]

See:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080087acb.html

Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher McCrory [mailto:chrismcc at pricegrabber.com] 
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:56 AM
> To: bep at whack.org
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC question
> 
> 
> Hello...
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 11:35, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Jim Mathers wrote:
> > 
> <snip>
> > | Also, while I am on the subject, does anyone know an IOS 
> that supports
> > | SSHv1 and is stable. I have been told that 
> c2600-ik8s-mz.122-16c.bin is
> > | a stable release but am interested in corroborating that 
> information.
> > |
> > 
> > If you are just using it for console connections, it won't 
> be all that
> > taxed.  Stability may not be you're greatest concern if you 
> really want the
> > security of SSH.  What's the harm if it happens to crash 
> once in a while?
> > In any case, there are several major versions that support 
> SSHv1 including
> > 12.2(19a), 12.3(5), and 12.2(15)T9.
> > 
> 
> Does this mean you can 'ssh c2610 -p 2035' instead of 'telnet c2610
> 2035' ?    
> 
> 
> 
> /me wishes Cisco had a ip+ssh only IOS image for the 2600 
> platform that
> didn't need a mem+flash upgrade.
> 
> 
> 
> <snip>
> 
> -- 
> Christopher McCrory
>  "The guy that keeps the servers running"
>  
> chrismcc at pricegrabber.com
>  http://www.pricegrabber.com
>  
> Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
> no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
> no defense.  I tried it.  Only tinfoil works.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>