[nsp] OSPF x firewall

Ives Dekoninck Ives.Dekoninck at eu.didata.com
Wed Dec 31 03:42:40 EST 2003


Configure the firewall with static routes using a default and other more
specific routes. An alternative could be to run a routing protocol
between router and FW, though I would not suggest that. (Routers do
routing, FW do firewalling).

Cheers,

-Ives-

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Furnell [mailto:andy at furnell.org.uk]
Sent: mercredi 31 décembre 2003 9:35
To: Ives Dekoninck
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] OSPF x firewall


On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:38:11AM +0100, Ives Dekoninck wrote:
> 
> Hi, Dimitri
> 
> IF you need two routers to talk a dynamic routing protocol with a FW
in
> the middle, I would suggest running BGP between the two.
> 
> The advantage of BGP is that you don't need to be on the same subnet
as
> long as it knows the route (static route) to the neighbour. The other
> advantage of running BGP is that on the firewall you only need to open
> TCP port 179 from the inside to the outside network.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 

The firewall still has to know where to route the packets while it's
passing them between routers.

A

-- 
Andy Furnell
andy at furnell.org.uk



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list