[nsp] limits to CEF per-packet load sharing?

Michael Loftis mloftis at wgops.com
Thu Feb 13 20:19:07 EST 2003


MLPPP will kill the routers almost for sure...It's just extremely 
inefficient.

--On Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:11 PM -0600 Edward Henigin 
<ed at staff.texas.net> wrote:

> Has anyone run into any limits over the number of interfaces that
> CEF per-packet load sharing will work?
>
> I've got a customer who wants 10 T1's (please, just don't ask :)
> and we're pondering using MLPPP or CEF per-packet load sharing.
> What's the most # of interfaces you've ever run CEF per-packet
> load sharing, and seen it work well?
>
> BTW, our side will be a 7500 or 7200, and the client side will be
> a 7200.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list