[nsp] CEF routing bug?

[Dmitri Kalintsev]

Hi Ilker,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 05:24:08PM +0100, Ilker Temir wrote:
> Wrong interpretation, CEF creates a /32 adjacency only if the entry is
> directly connected. Adjacency is created when there is no IGP route in the
> routing table.

[cut to the end]

Could you please elaborate on what does IOS consider "directly connected"?
Specific examples:

!
int fa0/0
ip add 1.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
ip route 2.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Fa0/0
!
ip route 3.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 1.0.0.254
!
ip route 4.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 3.0.0.1

Could you please comment, which of the networks above - 1.0.0.0/24 to
4.0.0.0/24 - will be considered directly connected, if *ALL* of the config
above is active at the same time?

Also, if different interpretation exists in different current IOS flavors,
please care to mention it. ;)

Thanks!

SY,
--
D.K.