[nsp] CEF routing bug?

[Ilker Temir]

1.0.0.0 and 2.0.0.0

Ilker

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dmitri Kalintsev" <dek at hades.uz>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [nsp] CEF routing bug?


> Hi Ilker,
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 05:24:08PM +0100, Ilker Temir wrote:
> > Wrong interpretation, CEF creates a /32 adjacency only if the entry is
> > directly connected. Adjacency is created when there is no IGP route in
the
> > routing table.
>
> [cut to the end]
>
> Could you please elaborate on what does IOS consider "directly connected"?
> Specific examples:
>
> !
> int fa0/0
> ip add 1.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> ip route 2.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Fa0/0
> !
> ip route 3.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 1.0.0.254
> !
> ip route 4.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 3.0.0.1
>
> Could you please comment, which of the networks above - 1.0.0.0/24 to
> 4.0.0.0/24 - will be considered directly connected, if *ALL* of the config
> above is active at the same time?
>
> Also, if different interpretation exists in different current IOS flavors,
> please care to mention it. ;)
>
> Thanks!
>
> SY,
> --
> D.K.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>