[nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Jul 31 00:37:22 EDT 2003
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:13:15PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > If 12.2S does what you need (haven't checked), I'd go for that.
[..]
> Excellent. I'm giving up on option 82 support in DHCP. It's not enough
> of a plus to bet the farm on. If the IOS side-by-side comparison tool is
> correct, it should work; I was surprised to see RBE supported.
Well, 12.2S *is* targeted at the ISP customers, so RBE should better be
there :-) - I'd expect more additions for the broadband/access things in
12.2(17)S or after that (but that's half a year hence, as far as I
understand the road map).
> Also CEF
> for inter-vlan switching is in there (for 802.1q VLANs). That is very good
> news. And I have no CT3 cards. In general I do need snmp counters to
> work; aside from the CT3 problem, do they?
I can only speak for T3, STM-1 and Gig/FastEthernet-Links, and what I can
see so far, SNMP counters and "show int" counters usually agree. The
"show int" ones get stuck every now and then, but SNMP (counter64 only,
didn't check counter32) works.
> Any word on whether compiled access lists work reliably?
On our three 7200s with 12.2S, they seem to (block what I'd expect, and
let the rest pass).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list