[nsp] Catalyst 4507R LAN Edge Routing (BGP)

[Mike Carter]

We have the 6509's and SUP II's (refurbed by our own engineers) stocked for
much less than you'd pay for the 4507R's (new) Not to mention I believe
there is a "lead time" issue for delivery on the 4507's.  If you want to
compare (refurb) pricing using 6509's or 6506's let me know the exact
configuration you're considering and I'll get some budgetary numbers
together for comparison.  You will save a ton of money installing the 65xx's
and we offer 1-year warranty on this tested equipment.  Let me know if I can
help.  I have assisted several here with equipment if you require refs.

Michael Carter
Sun/Cisco/IBM Sales
Alta Technologies
763-475-5327  (direct)
800-546-2582  (Ext. 327)
763-475-0409 (Fax)
AOL instant messenger  mikec at alta
email  mike.c at altatechnologies.com
Website  www.altatechnologies.com


 ***To be removed from this mailing list simply reply with remove in the
subject line***

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Temkin, David
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 9:03 AM
To: 'sh'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] Catalyst 4507R LAN Edge Routing (BGP)


FYI you can get 6500 equipment used and recertified/eligible for Cisco
maintenance for less than the price point of the 4507R loaded.

Not exactly the info you were looking for, but figured I'd chime in.

-----Original Message-----
From: sh [mailto:shmapty at foureleven.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 9:53 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] Catalyst 4507R LAN Edge Routing (BGP)


The Cat6K appears to serve many ISP/NSP and production data centers quite
well as a mixed layer2/3 device.  Because of cost, as well as the benefits
of the Supervisor IV (4507) over a minimally equipped Supervisor II (65xx),
we are considering deploying a series of 4507R on our LAN edge.

Does anybody have field experience (or 2nd-hand experience) with
deploying the 450x in a similar role?  In particular I am curious
if the layer3 performance/maturity is as good as the 65xx in a
similar configuration with BGP.

Our environment requires BGPv4 (so we'll need the separate InterDomain
routing license), GigE EtherChannel, and a significant number of layer3/4
ACLs, and VLANs.

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
attachments.  Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
prohibited.  Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or
should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or
sell any security or other financial instrument.  Neither the sender, his or
her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as
to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein
or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/