[nsp] 3550 vs 3750

BALIGANT Francois WANADOO francois.baligant at wanadoo.com
Mon May 12 11:54:32 EDT 2003


	Is this 24k true unicast routes (eg prefix+netmask) or
	Extreme Networks IPFDB-style where each destination IP address
	is mapped to a different entry ?

	Francois

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Piotr Marecki [mailto:p.marecki at tdcinternet.pl]
Envoyé : samedi 10 mai 2003 01:06
À : cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Objet : Re: [nsp] 3550 vs 3750


On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 22:43, Spin wrote:
> 128MB is a lot for L3 but from what i recall is not enough for full 
> BGP. How many memory is installed in 3550 in compare? Which is the 
> difference in memory and hardware between SMI and EMI on 3550?
> 
> Spin
> 
>

Also , While 3750 have more memory for holding routing table (128m vs
64m) in cotrol plane , it's forwarding plane (hardware that is actually
switching l3 packets) is more limited that 3550 one.According to cisco ,
3750 family asic's can hold 11k unicast routes , when 3550 family max is
24k.

regards

Piotr Marecki
 


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list