[nsp] Throughput of 100 Mbps

[Joe Lin]

If you just want to do an handful of static routes.

Why do you even need to do anything that requires intelligent routing?

Setup a Freebsd box and assign some static routes.

Or setup zebra, quagga, bird...

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Zach Wilkinson
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:52 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] Throughput of 100 Mbps

If you're talking about Ethernet Linux with Quagga on a cheap PC works.
Or
a 3550 as the previous message recommends.
I've heard that a stripped 3725 has the power if you need WAN
interfaces.
Don't know how cheap, though.

Zach

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vincent De Keyzer" <vincent at dekeyzer.net>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: [nsp] Throughput of 100 Mbps


Hi,

what's the smallest (read: cheapest :-) router that can process 100 Mbps
of
traffic?

Playing with a 3620, I could only get around 40 Mbps. What next? Do I
need
7200? What about the 2600 XM, which I know very little about?...

Vincent

PS: the machine in question would not need to do anything such as
filtering,
or huge routing tables. Just a handful of (static?) routes.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----


> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/