[nsp] 7600 and sup720 vs. rsp720?

[Alexey G Misurenko]

> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:09:00PM +0200, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> > > > See below for an example. We're running 12.1(13)E9, and will probably
> > > > upgrade to 12.1(20)E when that becomes available (we need a particular
> > > > bug fix for per destination load balancing which is scheduled for
> > > > 12.1(20)E).
> > > 
> > > i'm going to deploy several with flexwan + enhanced gigeth osm modules
> > > 
> > > 
> > > do you do mpls p or also pe on them?
> > 
> > PE. I believe you *can* use them for P only, but we don't.
> > 
> > With the Sup2/PFC2/MSFC2 (which we're using now) you need an external
> > fiber patch from a GE-WAN port to a regular GigE port if you want to
> > use the box for Ethernet aggregation *and* put some of the VLANs into
> > VRFs. Clumsy but works. Should be much nicer when the Sup720/RSP720
> > is available with MPLS functionality and stable.
> 
> Any ideas on date when mpls will be supported on Sup720 without GE-WAN
> or other OSM's ? 
> At the time we're planning to upgrade our msfc2-based catalysts
> in order to get MPLS PE functionality (now we just transit vlan's
> to core routers), and want to know - should we get Sup720 or GE-WAN's
> as per your scenario...
> 
>


As I know at january 2004, but I think that it will we better if
you ask you manager at Cisco.

-- 
WBR,   Alexey G Misurenko ( MAG-RIPE | MMAGG-RIPN )
CTO of Caravan ISP            http://www.caravan.ru
Phone: +7 095 3632252         Cell:  +7 903 7450163