[nsp] uRPF & load sharing

Haesu haesu at towardex.com
Tue Oct 21 14:05:06 EDT 2003


Would multilinkPPP interface work for you? If not, I guess the only suggestion is resort to loose-check uRPF, or use an access-list..

-hc

-- 
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Consulting, colocation, web hosting, network design and implementation
http://www.towardex.com | haesu at towardex.com
Cell: (978)394-2867     | Office: (978)263-3399 Ext. 170
Fax: (978)263-0033      | POC: HAESU-ARIN

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:08:05PM -0400, jlewis at lewis.org wrote:
> Is there a way to configure uRPF on customer facing interfaces where you
> have say several T1 interfaces per-packet load balanced on both sides 
> without using an access-list?  i.e. for a customer with 4 T1's, when I 
> turn on "ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx allow-self-ping", I can 
> no longer ping any of that customer's T1 serial interfaces.  I can't even 
> ping my own side of the connection.  This is a bit of a problem since our 
> monitoring system pings the customer interfaces to make sure they're up.
> 
> This is on a 7206 running 12.2(14)S1.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Jon Lewis *jlewis at lewis.org*|  I route
>  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
>  Atlantic Net                |  
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list