[nsp] uRPF & load sharing
Haesu
haesu at towardex.com
Tue Oct 21 14:05:06 EDT 2003
Would multilinkPPP interface work for you? If not, I guess the only suggestion is resort to loose-check uRPF, or use an access-list..
-hc
--
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Consulting, colocation, web hosting, network design and implementation
http://www.towardex.com | haesu at towardex.com
Cell: (978)394-2867 | Office: (978)263-3399 Ext. 170
Fax: (978)263-0033 | POC: HAESU-ARIN
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:08:05PM -0400, jlewis at lewis.org wrote:
> Is there a way to configure uRPF on customer facing interfaces where you
> have say several T1 interfaces per-packet load balanced on both sides
> without using an access-list? i.e. for a customer with 4 T1's, when I
> turn on "ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx allow-self-ping", I can
> no longer ping any of that customer's T1 serial interfaces. I can't even
> ping my own side of the connection. This is a bit of a problem since our
> monitoring system pings the customer interfaces to make sure they're up.
>
> This is on a 7206 running 12.2(14)S1.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis *jlewis at lewis.org*| I route
> Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
> Atlantic Net |
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list