[nsp] Transport E1/T1 signal transparently over IP

Alex Rubenstein alex at nac.net
Thu Oct 30 13:35:38 EST 2003




On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Temkin, David wrote:

> With AToM there'd be little reason to do it anymore if you're already
> running MPLS, provided you've got the H/W to do it.

Not _entirely_ true. AToM for E1 would allow PPP or HDLC passthru. In our
application, we are providing to the customer a _real_ E1, via ATM CES.



>
> (I guess that's not really an answer to your question, sorry)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Rubenstein [mailto:alex at nac.net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:28 AM
> To: Temkin, David
> Cc: 'Wim De Houwer'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [nsp] Transport E1/T1 signal transparently over IP
>
>
>
> Out of curiosity (this is going to sound mildly insane), is anyone doing ATM
> CES over MPLS?
>
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Temkin, David wrote:
>
> > CES over IP will be available soon in the 36/3700 series, but is not
> > quite production ready from my understanding.  You can do AToM but it
> > requires at least 7200's.
> >
> > Your other option (and I currently use these) is to go with a box like
> > the IPMux-1 from RAD.  Check
> > http://www.rad-direct.com/Application-t1-t3-extension-t1-t3-over-ip.ht
> > m for info.
> >
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex at nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
> --    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --
>

-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex at nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list