[c-nsp] Performance of Catalyst6509 using ACL

[Tim Stevenson]

On sup2, you can pretty much configure any input/output ACL using 
standard/extended IP access lists & still get h/w processing. Avoid use of 
the "log" keyword, as that will force all packets matching the ACE to hit 
the MSFC CPU.

What sort of ACL exactly do you intend to deploy?

Tim

At 01:59 AM 8/13/2004, cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net announced:
>Message: 8
>Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:40:15 +0800
>From: "Joe Shen" <jshen at christmas.9966.org>
>Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Performance of Catalyst6509 using ACL
>To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID: <000401c48108$c68e6a00$6f02a8c0 at topgun>
>Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="US-ASCII"
>
>Hi,
>
>Thanks.
>
>There are two 6509 installed, their  configuration infomation :



Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Technical Marketing Engineer, Catalyst 6500
Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
IP Phone: 408-526-6759
********************************************************
The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.