[c-nsp] Naming Conventions

[Clayton Kossmeyer]

You may also want to review

http://nanog.org/mtg-0405/ringel.html

Regards,

Clay

On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:46:36PM -0400, Richard Danielli wrote:
> IMHO
> 
> In a world now ripe with automated scans and freely available system
> identification applications, most systems names are going to go
> un-noticed. 
> 
> Consideration should be given to how well the naming convention helps
> you understand which machine your talking about, thus reducing confusion
> during an incident. 
> 
> -rd-
> 
> On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 12:34, Paul Stewart wrote:
> > This is a good question...
> > 
> > I don't like the idea of telling the world what kind of equipment we
> > have at our edge and/or servicing a customer.... we wanted to adopt a
> > method that is easy for our techs to understand but for an "outsider"
> > not easy to understand.
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Richard Danielli
> President - eSubnet
> 
> http://www.eSubnet.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/