[c-nsp] portchannel load balancing
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Tue Dec 7 13:06:09 EST 2004
We've noticed recently that portchannels between 3550s and 7500s aren't
giving us the level of load sharing (across 2 FE) that we'd like. Using
the default (src MAC) load balancing, we're seeing the switches send 2/3
of their output traffic over one FE, while the routers actually balance
their output to the switches almost perfectly.
The portchannels are layer 2 and are being used to carry VLAN traffic to
.1q subints on the routers where some are in VRFs for MPLS VPN. I read
that we might get better load balancing if the portchannels were layer 3
(balancing could be based on src MAC and src/dst IPs), but we need layer 2
to deliver the VLANs.
Can a 3550 have both a layer 3 uplink over which it routes routable
traffic and a layer 2 uplink to the same router over which VLAN traffic
gets sent?
Or is the only/best answer to go ahead and find some GEIP or GEIP+'s...or
add a 3rd FE to the portchannel and hope it takes more away from the
currently prefered FE?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list