[nsp] Effective bandwidth in Frame Relay

Church, Chuck cchurch at wamnetgov.com
Wed Feb 4 11:22:44 EST 2004

I thought at one time that only Cisco LMI type provided the CIR in the updates.  When I deal with Verizon, they usually ask what LMI type you want to use, so I ask for cisco just for this reason.

Chuck Church
Wam!Net Government Services
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch at wamnetgov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared at puck.nether.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:02 AM
> To: elatour at cimex.com.cu
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] Effective bandwidth in Frame Relay
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:46:27PM -0500, elatour at cimex.com.cu wrote:
> > How I measure the real bandwidth in a Frame Relay link, and 
> what is the
> > real committed information rate (CIR)?
> 	You can see this (depending on the switch used) in the
> 'debug frame-relay lmi' command output.
> 	You should see it dump a list of all the dlci (pvc) numbers
> as well as the CIR of each periodically.  I've seen this with 
> success with
> the GTE (now verizon) frame-relay srevices.
> 	- Jared
> -- 
> Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
> clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements 
> are only mine.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list