[nsp] bridged tunnel

David Curran dm at nuvox.net
Mon Feb 16 14:04:22 EST 2004


When you say "bridged" are you meaning you want to forward ATM cells,
untouched, to the far-end interface or are you terminating layer 3 on the
local interface?

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Kenny Stoltz
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 12:05 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] bridged tunnel


I have a ATM PVC on one router that I'd like to be bridged to a ethernet
sub int on another router, however no direct link (L2 at least) between
the two exists. Is there any way to give layer 2 transport without MPLS,
like via a tunnel that was bridged on each end. I don't even know how to
start going about that.

Would something along the lines of:

Router A:

interface atm6/0.10076 point-to-point
   pvc 1/76

interface tunnel 76
   tunnel source interface atm6/0.10076
   tunnel destination 10.10.10.5

interface f0/0
   ip address 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0

(i'm assuming it knows how to route to 10.10.10.5 via eigrp :-) )

Router B:

interface f0/0
   ip address 10.10.10.5



_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list