[nsp] stupid NAT tricks
Christopher J. Wolff
chris at bblabs.com
Sun Feb 29 01:55:57 EST 2004
Hello,
I have a Ethernet sub interface on router A that uses an overloaded NAT pool
for internet access. I have another Ethernet sub interface on router B
(connected to A) that has a server I want a device on subinterface router A
to connect to. However I don't want it to use the overloaded nat pool. I
set up a static route however it appears that the devices behind the router
A subinterface want to use the NAT pool even if there is a static route
between the two devices.
Here's what it looks like
Router A---------LAN------------Router B
| |
NAT pool A------------| File Server
| |
Subint 10.0.0.1/24 |
|
Internet
Any suggestions would be appreciated. I read something on the cisco site
about a 'no-payload' statement which seemed to apply to this situation but
it wasn't clear how. Thank you.
Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list