[nsp] AToM

[Ian Cox]

EoMPLS with PFC3a is not supported in any shipping version of code today.

EoMPLS with PFC3b-XL is supported with the 12.2(17b)SXA release of code.


Ian

At 06:42 PM 12/22/2003 +0100, Antoine Versini wrote:
>Hi NSP !
>
>I'm trying to achieve layer 2 ethernet transport between two 7600 w/
>SUP720 running 12.2(17a)SX1. I've been carefully studying
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft/121limit/121ex/121ex8a/eompls9.htm
>and then reproduced the configuration. The VC goes UP, but doesn't carry
>any traffic :
>
>c6k03-v#sh mpls l2transport vc 69 detail
>Local interface: Vl42 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 42 up
>   Destination address: 194.117.192.203, VC ID: 69, VC status: up
>     Tunnel label: 17, next hop 62.34.0.26
>     Output interface: Vl210, imposed label stack {17 16}
>   Create time: 02:11:26, last status change time: 00:00:42
>   Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 194.117.192.203:0 up
>     MPLS VC labels: local 16, remote 16
>     Group ID: local 39, remote 39
>     MTU: local 1500, remote 1500
>     Remote interface description: AToM c6k04-v
>   Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>   VC statistics:
>     packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>     byte totals:   receive 0, send 0
>     packet drops:  receive 0, send 0
>
>Here is the basic config i've done on the two edge routers (the configs
>are symetrical, except the destination IP addresses, of course) :
>
>no spanning-tree vlan 42
>!
>vlan 42
>  name AToM
>!
>interface GigabitEthernet5/2
>  no ip address
>  logging event link-status
>  media-type rj45
>  speed 100
>  duplex full
>  switchport
>  switchport access vlan 42
>  switchport mode access
>!
>interface Vlan42
>  description AToM c6k03-v
>  no ip address
>  mpls l2transport route 194.117.192.203 69
>!
>
>An end-station is attached to the Gi5/2 interface and there is another one
>connected the same way on the other end. They share the same IP subnet,
>but can't ping each other. Please also note that there is a P router
>between the two edge 7600's and IP labels are switched fine (thus I assume
>this is not a problem on the MPLS core itself).
>
>If you think there is a mistake in this configuration, feel free to point
>it to me :)
>
>Thanks,
>AV.
>
>--
>Antoine Versini
>IP Networks Project Manager / T-Online France - Club-Internet
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/