[nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs
Robert A. Hayden
rhayden at geek.net
Wed Jan 14 14:51:11 EST 2004
Shhhh. Cisco will "fix" that bug.
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Griffin wrote:
> "no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid" seems to remove the gbic test
> for the ones I have tested, at least on the 3750 with 12.1.19 code.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 13:36, Roldan, Brad wrote:
> > There was a great presentation given at the last NANOG on this very
> > topic.
> >
> > http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/wodelet.html
> >
> > The general message was that no, you will not be able to use
> > non-Cisco branded SFPs unless you reprogram the EPROMs. See page 21 and
> > 25. I have not confirmed the information first hand. YMMV.
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Rajeshbansal9 at aol.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:55 AM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs
> >
> >
> > All:
> >
> > Anyone tried using non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs in 6500. I found out
> > that
> > Finisar makes it fr Cisco also but want to make sure if there are any
> > issues
> > with running non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Raj
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list