[nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs

[Robert A. Hayden]

Shhhh.  Cisco will "fix" that bug.

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Griffin wrote:

> "no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid" seems to remove the gbic test
> for the ones I have tested, at least on the 3750 with 12.1.19 code.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 13:36, Roldan, Brad wrote:
> >    There was a great presentation given at the last NANOG on this very
> > topic.
> > 
> > 	http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/wodelet.html
> > 
> >    The general message was that no, you will not be able to use
> > non-Cisco branded SFPs unless you reprogram the EPROMs. See page 21 and
> > 25. I have not confirmed the information first hand. YMMV. 
> > 
> > Brad
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Rajeshbansal9 at aol.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:55 AM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs
> > 
> > 
> > All:
> > 
> > Anyone tried using non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs in 6500. I found out
> > that 
> > Finisar makes it fr Cisco also but want to make sure if there are any
> > issues 
> > with running non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs. 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Raj
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>