[nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs
Chris Griffin
cgriffin at ufl.edu
Wed Jan 14 14:35:08 EST 2004
"no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid" seems to remove the gbic test
for the ones I have tested, at least on the 3750 with 12.1.19 code.
Chris
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 13:36, Roldan, Brad wrote:
> There was a great presentation given at the last NANOG on this very
> topic.
>
> http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/wodelet.html
>
> The general message was that no, you will not be able to use
> non-Cisco branded SFPs unless you reprogram the EPROMs. See page 21 and
> 25. I have not confirmed the information first hand. YMMV.
>
> Brad
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Rajeshbansal9 at aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:55 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs
>
>
> All:
>
> Anyone tried using non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs in 6500. I found out
> that
> Finisar makes it fr Cisco also but want to make sure if there are any
> issues
> with running non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs.
>
> Thanks
>
> Raj
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list