[nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs

Chris Griffin cgriffin at ufl.edu
Wed Jan 14 14:35:08 EST 2004


"no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid" seems to remove the gbic test
for the ones I have tested, at least on the 3750 with 12.1.19 code.

Chris


On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 13:36, Roldan, Brad wrote:
>    There was a great presentation given at the last NANOG on this very
> topic.
> 
> 	http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/wodelet.html
> 
>    The general message was that no, you will not be able to use
> non-Cisco branded SFPs unless you reprogram the EPROMs. See page 21 and
> 25. I have not confirmed the information first hand. YMMV. 
> 
> Brad
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Rajeshbansal9 at aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:55 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] Cisco LC MM SFPs
> 
> 
> All:
> 
> Anyone tried using non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs in 6500. I found out
> that 
> Finisar makes it fr Cisco also but want to make sure if there are any
> issues 
> with running non Cisco "stamped" LC MM SFPs. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Raj
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list