[nsp] alternative to "l2tp security crypto-profile"
Victor Sudakov
sudakov at sibptus.tomsk.ru
Wed Jan 21 02:47:37 EST 2004
Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> If vpdn traffic between LAC and LNS needs to be encrypted, I wonder if
> it is possible to use conventional transport mode IPSec (with crypto
> acls) between the two, instead of using the "l2tp security crypto-profile"
> mechanism as specified in
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t4/ftl2tsec.htm
>
> I do not have 12.2T and do not wish to migrate to it or to 12.3 yet.
I guess that is it:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/24.html
I just wonder why Cisco should have introduced crypto-profiles at all.
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list