[nsp] Dynamic load balancing outgoing traffic (unequal paths)
Noriega, Alejandro
ANoriega at prima.com.ar
Mon Jul 19 10:06:09 EDT 2004
Thanks for the information Nicolaj !
I read the link and searched about this feature but it doesn't talk much
about how the weighting works. I only found this:
"Use the weighted method of GLBP load balancing when you need unequal
load balancing because routers in the GLBP group have different
forwarding capacities."
Can I do load balancing of my outgoing traffic with different upstreams
bandwidths with this feature?
This works like eIGRP variance?
Thanks,
Alejandro.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolaj Ottsen [mailto:no at webpartner.dk]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:32 AM
To: Noriega, Alejandro; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] Dynamic load balancing outgoing traffic (unequal
paths)
Since you have 3 upstream routers the solutions you suggest could become
very complex, espcialy when you need to coordinate with multiple
providers.
You could use glbp
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature
_guide09186a00801541c8.html ) instead, it supports Weighting. Or use
multiple HSRP groups to "manualy" share the load between your routere.
GLBP is preferred since all you servers will share the same gateway.
Nicolaj Ottsen
-----Original Message-----
From: Noriega, Alejandro [mailto:ANoriega at prima.com.ar]
Sent: 19. juli 2004 14:57
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] Dynamic load balancing outgoing traffic (unequal paths)
Importance: High
Hello guys,
I'm looking for a scalability solution for dynamic load
balancing the outgoing traffic of my ISP with unequal bandwidth paths. I
have 3 upstream with theirs respective bandwidth: 60, 200 and 120 Mbps
each one in separate routers which are acting like route reflector
clients.
I was thinking in this solutions:
.- Injecting a default route from the RR-clients to my RR via
eIGRP and using variance (I don't know if this could work).
.- Reading about BGP Link Bandwidth in this case I may work with
my upstream.
.- And loosing the dynamic conf: full routing setting different
weights to a set of routes between my upstream.
Any idea?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Alejandro.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list