[nsp] Setting router ospf passive-interface default

[Niels Bakker]

>> Would you, therefore, increase the amount of code in Cisco's
>> implementation of OSPF so that when you make a global change to OSPF,
>> it first checks to see if implementations of your change are currently
>> configured?

* Delbert.Hudson at LOSANGELES.AF.MIL (Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN) [Tue 15 Jun 2004, 19:02 CEST]:
> not speaking for anyone but myself but i think a general
> consensus as regards the impractical side is the logistics of 
> implementing the code changes and any anomalies that may arise
> across vendors and enterprise would be monstrous.

Vendor J has implemented such incremental configuration changes from day 1

Reality and features are only related in how hard you can lean on your
sales representative


	-- Niels.

--