[nsp] ATMoMPLS question

[Bob Arthurs]

Out of interest what does l2tpv3 lack when compared to tcc (i'm not familiar 
with tcc)??


>From: Alex Rubenstein <alex at nac.net>
>To: "Tantsura, Jeff" <jeff.tantsura at capgemini.com>
>CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: RE: [nsp] ATMoMPLS question
>Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:55:11 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
>
>
>Question is, when will cisco have a wide-scale, multi-platform deployment
>of the equivalent of Juniper's TCC?
>
>L2TPv3 has the beginnings of this, but isn't anywhere close.
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Tantsura, Jeff wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > UTI has been replaced by L2TPv3.
> >
> > UTI is a Cisco proprietary protocol that offers a simple high-speed
> > transparent Layer 2-to-Layer 2 service over an IP backbone. The UTI
> > protocol lacks the signalling capability and standards support necessary
> > for large-scale commercial service. To begin to answer the need for a
> > standard way to provide large-scale VPN connectivity over an IP core
> > network, limited migration from UTI to L2TPv3 was introduced in CiscoIOS
> > Release12.0(21)S. The L2TPv3 feature in CiscoIOSRelease 12.0(23)S
> > introduced a more robust version of L2TPv3 to replace UTI.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:36 PM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] ATMoMPLS question
> >
> > On (2004-06-16 18:32 +0200), Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
> >
> > > >  is it possible to do 'mpls l2transport route x.x.x.x yy' for
> > > > ethernet on two interfaces of the same PE?
> > >
> > > No, but Ethernet-to-Ethernet can easily be done with plain old
> > > transparent bridging ("bridge-group"-interface command) if your
> > > platform/IOS supports this.
> >
> >  And UTI I suppose, available f.ex. where ther is not IRB/BVI to my best
> > knowledge.
> >
> > --
> >   ++ytti
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Our name has changed.  Please update your address book to the following 
>format: "recipient at capgemini.com".
> >
> > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential 
>and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the 
>person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  you 
>are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, 
>or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this  message in 
>error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all  copies of this 
>message.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_________________________________________________________________
Want to block unwanted pop-ups? Download the free MSN Toolbar now!  
http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/