[nsp] route-reflector setup questoins

[Pete Templin]

matthew zeier wrote:
> I have a network that's loosely like this:
> 
> RouterA (Transit)
>   |
>   | OC48
>   |
> RouterB ---- RouterC (Transit)
>   \             /
> [other ibgp routers]
> 
> B and C are fully meshed with each other and all the other ibgp speakers.
> All are on the same network.  My intention is to have B and C as route
> reflectors.
> 
> A is only connected to B.  I'd like to keep things simple and have A just
> peer with B.  I had configs similiar to below.  However, I noticed that ebgp
> routes learned on A were passed to B but B did not pass to C.  Do A and C
> also need to peer and does A need to be a RR client as well?

Two choices:

A and C need to peer, or
B should have A listed as an RR client