[nsp] route-reflector setup questoins

[matthew zeier]

> matthew zeier wrote:
> > I have a network that's loosely like this:
> >
> > RouterA (Transit)
> >   |
> >   | OC48
> >   |
> > RouterB ---- RouterC (Transit)
> >   \             /
> > [other ibgp routers]
> >
> > B and C are fully meshed with each other and all the other ibgp
speakers.
> > All are on the same network.  My intention is to have B and C as route
> > reflectors.
> >
> > A is only connected to B.  I'd like to keep things simple and have A
just
> > peer with B.  I had configs similiar to below.  However, I noticed that
ebgp
> > routes learned on A were passed to B but B did not pass to C.  Do A and
C
> > also need to peer and does A need to be a RR client as well?
>
> Two choices:
>
> A and C need to peer, or
> B should have A listed as an RR client

Ideally, I C should have A listed as an RR client as well, no?  B already
has A as an RR client.