[c-nsp] Router Terminate 25 IPSEC Tunnels

[Mark]

How many VPN IPSEC Tunnels can support 1701?

Mark


On Nov 2, 2004, at 4:56 PM, Michael Markstaller wrote:

> if your're willing to deal with some minor bugs and memleaks, the 
> 1711/12 are affordable, give OOB with modem/ISDN and work fine. use 
> 12.3(7)T - works currently quite well as long as not using some 
> specific things.
>
> I'm still in the process of making Cisco fix the everylasting "memleak 
> in IKE" but with current 12.3(7)T4 and 25 tunnels this will hit you 
> once a year.. and don't use route-maps at all.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Mark
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 1:51 PM
> To: cisco-nsp
> Subject: [c-nsp] Router Terminate 25 IPSEC Tunnels
>
>
> I  need to terminate 25 IPSEC (3DES is beer but not a requirement)
> TUNNELs for a small VPN over slow speed ADSL (512K per line). I
> proposed to my customers the Cisco Soho 96 for every single termination
> and now I need to choose a TUNNELS concentrator. I used 1760VPN in the
> past but a smaller solution (not modular and more economical) is
> welcomed. Any suggestions?
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>