[c-nsp] Performance Degradation Using VLANs

[Brian Feeny]

Mario,

Just curious, are you terminating these customers ethernet on that  
router?
Is this some sort of in-building ethernet type product?


Brian

On Nov 17, 2004, at 2:52 PM, Mario Antonio wrote:

> Dear List,
>
> As part of a network security,  we assign a unique vlan to each of our
> Broad-Band customers.
> I want to know if there will be a noticeable performance degradation  
> using
> multiple subinterfaces on a Cisco
> 26xx router.
> Let's say that I configure 200 subinterfaces in a 2621 router (24 MB  
> Ram)
> Will this badly degrade the router's performance? Will I need more Ram  
> or a
> powerful router?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Mario Antonio
>
> ---
> [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus  
> Protection System]
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
------
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP    	e: signal at shreve.net
Network Engineer           			p: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc.             			f: 318.221.6612

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20041117/0e45bfe6/PGP.bin