[c-nsp] Growing BGP tables

[Randy Bush]

> Sure, why not.  Make that an option like everything else in the 
> route-map match clause.  I don't think anybody would care about people 
> losing their traffic engineering as a result of this (I certainly 
> don't).  However having the "same next hop" clause allows us to 
> immediately drop all the cruft from those operators that subscribe to 
> the "you can't hijack me if I de-aggregate to /24's" stupidity.  That's 
> a major win without changing the "semantics" that people choose to rely 
> upon for their traffic engineering.
>> some of us won't care if it's the same next hop.  i wish to be
>> able to choose not to pay for your traffic engineering.

cool with me.  i support stomping all flavors of stupidity,
just as long as i get to define it. :-)

randy
---
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?