[c-nsp] Growing BGP tables
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Nov 26 10:04:00 EST 2004
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:22:03PM +0000, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> > Which is a really good thing. AS5 doesn't *need* the /24 prefix, because
> > the /16 will point in the same direction anyway.
>
> how does this help if you wish to offer all routes, guy tal mentioned earlier..
> if one operator implements filtering they will immediately reduce the amnount of
> transit traffic that they pull as the customer will be receiving more specifics
> from another upstream
Victory of economics over reason...
Why would the downstream even *want* the /24 in the first place? There
is no additional information to be gained by it (unless you're very
near to the place of origin).
Most end-sites these days don't carry a full table anymore anyway, due to
"it won't fit in my 3640".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list